New meeting had today the Council of OPANAAM (National Air and Railway and Transport Security Organization) for the accident at Tempi And the relevant finding, which has been at the center of the discussions for the last 24 hours.
Following the Alalum created with the Universities of Ghent and Pisawho… distanced themselves from the part of the Fireplace finding in Tempi, EPODAAM is “as soon as possible” to “Democritus” which will now be called upon to certify the results of the firefighting finding, along with “at least one other institution”.
During the meeting, clarifications were given on the University of Ghent, and in particular whether the Deputy Chairman was aware of the participation of the TEOPO (Investigating Independent Experts Committee) in GANDE’s research. According to Kostas Lakafosi, the Deputy President had been informed by email in late January.
The deputy president, for his part, argues that “because of his huge volume of correspondence and his non -involvement with the investigation, he had not opened and read the attachments” …
In detail the announcement for today’s (8/4/25) meeting of EPANAAM
The Council was extensively informed by the Deputy Chairman and Chairman of the Railway Sector on pending railway issues.
The Deputy President suggested to proceed urgently in principle with Democritus And then with others the strengthening and confirmation of the open point of the EPANAAM finding regarding the causes of the fireplace in every possible way so that the explanation that is given is scientifically proper and if possible.
It was also informed that the Deputy Chairman received a letter from Mr. Lakafosi claiming that the Deputy Chairman had been informed by an e -mail in which he was not acceptable but notified by his relevant. for the participation of the land in GANDE’s research in late January. The deputy chairman said he had requested for a week to be given the message if he existed and that he recognizes the existence of a particular message which, due to his huge volume of correspondence and his non -involvement with the investigation, had not opened and read the attachments.
He also considers that the use of the land by the Investigation Committee to calculate fireplace and cooperation with the University of Ghent was legally done in any case but incorrectly and still believes that There were other ways to do research without giving objectivity handles. While he still believes that only the Democritus or Supreme Foundation has the prestige for this.
It was also informed that Mr. Papadimitriou tried with three emails to secure the consensus of the Pisa and Ghent universities so that the corresponding part of the finding would not be removed but it was not achieved so this move was legally necessary.
EPOAAM’s finding is a documentation and reference to all the errors that led to the conflict and No research on fireplace.
The Council expresses its support for the finding and excellent work of the investigation team and stresses that the assessment of non -participation in the phenomenon of the creation of the Silicone Fireplace is based on a certificate from Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Konstantopoulou and of course remains as it is.
Finally, he states that in no way states that the estimate included in the finding is incorrect but as the Commission itself had requested it should be confirmed and certified immediately and certified and certified When this relevant part of the finding is done will come back With absolutely certified results and estimates of higher university institutions.
According to the president of the railway sector, the Council has the task of proceeding as soon as possible and in the most convenient way to certify the results of the Tempi investigation committee regarding the causes of the fireplace in top and well -known prestigious university or related institutions Democritus and another at least another institution that will choose it, with the question of what is the cause of the fireplace in Tempi since they are not silicone oils.
On the above points, Mr. Petros Eugenikos, a member of the Board of Directors, said that it should be clear and agreed by a decision of the Board of Directors. The exact object assigned to Democritus or any other research or university institution. In addition, the criteria for selection of any institution should be clearly imprinted on the causes of fireplace and other fires.
He also asked to be informed in how (correspondence, letter, another way) was assigned to the Ghent University of the questions that the researchers of the university responded to their reports of 28/1/2025.
Finally, he asked for specific information on the three emails reported by the Agency’s vice president that he sent to secure the consent of the Pisa and Ghent universities so as not to have to remove the corresponding part of the finding, as well as the reasons why it was not achieved.
The Council unanimously agreed with the proposals of the president of the railway sector.