The majority of New Democracy MPs in Pre -trial committee He concluded that criminal prosecution should be brought against Christos Triantopoulos for the offense of breach of duty. According to the finding they submitted, an earlier investigation by the Larissa Public Prosecutor’s Office has already been conducted, which included the issuance of two prosecutors.
The first archived complaint of non -political figures and forwarded the dossier to the House for the Deputy Minister, while the second was prosecuted to four natural persons. The majority members argue that the material gathered is sufficient to propose in the House of Representatives the commencement of the criminal proceedings and Mr Triantopoulos’s presence is not necessary for additional explanations, as he had already responded to a relevant call.
The Commission considers that the facts and their legal evaluation, as described in the aforementioned prosecutors that led to the prosecution of four people, are sufficient evidence for the prosecution of the Deputy Minister.
In conclusion, the majority of the preliminary investigation proposes a criminal prosecution for breach of duty, based solely on the existing evidence and prosecutors, regardless of Mr Triantopoulos’ desire to be brought to justice quickly.
PASOK’s finding
In the text of the opinion of PASOK MPs – members of the pre -trial committee M. Apostolakis, E. Liakoulis and G. Moulkiotis are noted:
For the bypass of the constitutional process that “with the sole responsibility of the government majority of the New Democracy, the pre -trial committee did not conduct the Constitution and the law proceedings, did not perform its prosecutors, did not investigate the case, did not investigate the case, did not investigate the case, did not investigate the case. It is noted that “the approach of the government majority to complete the committee’s work, without any substantial investigation of the potential offenses committed, constitutes a conscious choice of political feasibility, concealment, but also a blatant violation and circumvention of its own constitution.” It is noted that “this approach has a direct effect that it can be formal only for the misdemeanor of the breach of duty without the possibility of expanding other, possibly heavier, offenses that may have been committed by Mr. Christos Triantopoulos or other politicians.”
It is emphasized that “the Constitution, as it is today, leaves no room for selection, but imposes specific procedures, without giving the Minister the opportunity to determine the stages of investigating his responsibilities himself, as Mr Triantopoulos attempted through his letter. The guaranteed responsibilities of the preliminary investigation, such as a preliminary examination, constitute both a procedural and a substantive condition for the drafting of a reasoned finding, as provided by law. Moreover, since new evidence had emerged, later on both the case file formed before the Public Prosecutor’s Office of Larissa and the PASOK Movement for the establishment of the Commission. Among other things, we are referring to the finding of EPANAAM, which confirms the alteration of the tragedy of the tragedy in the first few days after the accident and the loss of critical evidence but also to Mr Triantopoulos’ email to other government officials. “
It is noted that “if the government majority considers that Mr Triantopoulos bears no criminal liability for his acts or omissions and, however, decides to prosecute him, then beyond the obvious paradox and contradiction of the decision, the decision is made by the decision, abuse of power. “
For the controversial meeting of March 3, 2023, it is noted in PASOK’s opinion that “the case file shows serious evidence that the” informal meeting “of March 3, 2023, in the presence of the Deputy Minister under Prime Minister Chr. Triantopoulos, as well as a scale of government agents, two days after the tragedy, is the opening event of the unfair intervention in the area of accident and alteration. The pretext only for this illegal intervention was used the need to restore the train traffic, which was not carried out for about another month (on 29.3.2023) and regardless of the deterioration of the site, which had been completed within a few hours, on 4.3.2023, resulting in the disappearance of critical evidence. At the expense of the other participants in this “meeting”, the prosecution of Criminal Prosecutor Larissa was ordered, except for Mr Triantopoulos, for whom the prosecutor was deprived of relevant competence in view of Article 86 p.
In the text of the opinion of PASOK MPs, it is proposed:
- To prosecute the former Deputy Minister under the Prime Minister Christos Triantopoulos for the offense of breach of duty during the period between 3.3.2023 and 6.3.2023.
- Continue by the competent judicial authorities to legally investigate any other offenses committed by Mr Christos Triantopoulos or by other political or non -political persons.