Against the choices of his leadership PASOK They stand by party executives, expressing their disagreements in a distinct reason.
Nikos Androulakis’ decision to address, in addition to SYRIZA and New left and at Sauce In order for Zoe Konstantopoulou party to sign the common proposal against the government for Tempe, it is considered incorrect by PASOK MPs and officials, who no longer avoid pointing out the fact.
The reaction comes while PASOK has passed in the third place in third placefollowing the Freedom Cruise Party, which records a double -digit percentage.
“As a result, it seems that it was not right to sign the motion of censure with Zoe Konstantopoulou,” he said yesterday speaking to Action24 TV station, PASOK MP. Nadia Giannakopoulou Criticizing Mr. Androulakis’ choices expresses the views of other executives awaiting party meetings to discuss in detail about the party’s attitude towards the dilemmas produced by political news daily.
“There is a wrong feeling that we agree or find commonly composed with forces expressed in an extreme way- the characterization is populism,” also stressed Ms. Giannakopoulou, which recently supported the immediate opening of the discussion to revise Article 16 from now And not during the second revisionist parliament, as he had stated that Mr. Androulakis would become. The West Athens MP also noted that “in a period of toxicity in the political climate, PASOK has moved seriously and therefore it is a mistake to make the wrong impressions.”
Glomex Player(eexbs1jkdkewvzn, v-d8rdvefn41nt)
Earlier the executive of the political center, Thanassis Glavina He has also carried out the duties of PASOK spokesman said characteristically on the same issue during an interview with EMU that: “We could accept that it was a mistake to sign the motion of censure with Konstantopoulou.”
Glomex Player(eexbs1jkdkewvzn, v-d8rezrojizzl)
A harsh criticism of Harilaou Trikoupi was also brought yesterday by the former minister and current member of the Central Committee of the Party, Katerina Batzeli which openly disagreed with the rhetoric of answers to SYRIZA MP Nikos Pappas about his previous statements. “It is a toxic and incorrect statement that Mr. Androulakis pulls him off his right lapel. But PASOK, an institutional and serious party, cannot slide into a “13-0” toxicity. Justice has decided. We closed with it. Because we follow the language of the New Democracy, it confirms that someone pulls you off the right lapel. “
SYRIZA’s parliamentary spokesman, Nikos Pappas He had argued, among other things, that: “Let us tell us Mr. Androulakis who pulls him off the right lapel every day and let him not seek excuses for the introversion caused by his party by daily ambiguities.” Mr Pappas disagreed, as he said, that Mr Androulakis claimed that “if we pummeled the forces would be reduced overall, which violates common sense and mathematics”. And he went on to say, “And because he violates them, I feel that, maybe someone has vetoed him.”
Harilaou Trikoupi reacted, demanding from Koumoundourou to the deletion of Mr. Pappas. “Once again SYRIZA executives prove that they remain incomprehensible, immersed in toxicity and backdrops. PASOK constitutes a front with society by shaping the alternative government proposal and giving a political battle against the New Democracy. Does the SYRIZA leadership condemn the unthinkable statements of Mr Pappas? Or adopts them? Will a SYRIZA member of SYRIZA remain a toxic hybrid? ”
It should be noted that the SYRIZA leader the day before he had invited PASOK and the new Left to begin the dialogue for a programmatic understanding and a single ballot, which will win the New Democracy in the forthcoming elections. Mr Famellos and SYRIZA executives are essentially rejecting the possibility of a convergence with Zoe Konstantopoulou, characterizing her party, as well as Mr Haritsis Monothematically.