Government sources for distortion of P. Marinakis’ statements by PASOK: “Continuous use of” Copper “methods”

“Mr Marinakis never spoke of Mr Voridis’ political responsibility,” they emphasize

‘The constant use of’ cutter ‘methods and The distortion of the truth by PASOK, They greatly explain why the needle is “stuck”, as even officials in the opposition party, “government sources said.

They point out that “the last example of” cutter “use was the current interview of PASOK spokesman K. Tsoukalas at the SKAI television station where he claimed that the government spokesman said that” Mr Voridis has political responsibility “, which was not said by Mr. Indeed, Mr. Tsoukalas knowingly distorted Mr Marinakis’ statement, adding that “this is the only way to explain his phrase for sole responsibility”.

Indeed, government sources quote the relevant excerpts of the government spokesman’s statements, stressing that it is shown that Mr Marinakis has never spoken of Mr Voridis’ political responsibility and stress that the “falsification of truth, in the absence of serious political reason”.

Here are the relevant excerpts:

“The political level is well known between Mr Varra and Mr Voridis. It’s nothing new. We didn’t become wiser. The only thing that Mr Varra’s deposition was confirmed, among all the other deposits he was expecting and the opposition “in the corner” to tool, is that both Mr Varas and all the others who filed, confirmed that there was no Maximus intervention and no intervention. This does not mean that given this political disagreement-relay, describes any criminal liability of Mr Voridis, a narrative that the opposition was trying to build the previous period, without the slightest element. It’s two different things. Our position does not change in the alleged criminal liability of Mr Voridis, who did not arise from absolutely any evidence. “

“Now, in terms of Mr Voridis’ responsibility, if you want to ask me something specific, because if Mr Voridis is responsible for implemented something that was already foreseen legally and suggested by the relevant administration, which existed from the previous government, this is a conversation that I think. But I do not think it is fair what has been happening for many years and Mr Voridis inherited, in the need to pay the farmers, to translate into the sole political responsibility of Makis Voridis. In terms of criminal responsibilities, yes, I was clear and I think the New Democracy parliamentary group and the data itself was clear, no matter how the opposition tried to distort them. “

Source link

Leave a Comment