Stefan Lanua has set up an analysis of the controversial phases for his last Super League match. The game that gathered the… lights is of course Kifissia – AEK, with the “yellow -blacks” having strong complaints.
Stefan Lanua noted that the penalty shoot -out in favor of Kifissia, in Strakosa’s mark on Tetei, was incorrectly given, said that Pierre had to get red to hit Xenopoulos with the plugs, while stressing that his hand was not in the way.
At the same time, Stefan Lanua emphasized that Relvas properly accepted the red card, said Zerson’s goal with the score at 2-2 was properly canceled and that the penalty shootout was given to Simon to mark Jovic.
What Stefan Lanua said in the VIDEO of KED
For the penalty shootout by Kifissia for Strakosa’s mark on Tetei: “Here the goalkeeper tries to play the ball with his right hand. He has no risky contact with his opponent. If there is contact it is a very light touch. We do not expect a penalty here or the VAR intervention to change the referee’s decision.”
For Pierre’s foul on Xenopoulos: “In this case the AEK striker tries to play the ball after a cross and with the right foot stretched comes in contact with the opposing goalkeeper. The signs from the shots on the goalkeeper’s body how dangerous this move was. We are waiting for a red card and the VAR intervention.”
For the penalty shootout by AEK in the hand of the commerce: “After a cross of Kifissia’s No.14, he touches the ball with his left hand that is not raised high. Here we consider it to be an unexpected ball between two defenses at a short distance without any intention of playing the ball by hand.
For the Red of Relva in the mark on Tetei: “In this case the defender (No.44) prevents the attacker from a clear opportunity to score, holding him and then pushing him. The referee made the right decision. Red card.”
For the goal of Zerson of Kifissia (with the score at 2-2) canceled: “Here the player with the No10 of Kifissia succeeds by touching the ball with his right hand, after the ball hit the beam. The referee made the right decision.”
For the penalty shootout by Jovic and AEK made it 2-3: “In this case, the defender with the No2 of Kifissia overturns his opponent with his right foot in the penalty shoot -out. The referee made the right decision.”
For the first penalty shootout by Levadiakos against Panetoliko: “Here the defender touches the ball with his left hand, which is raised, away from his body and in a unnatural position, while the ball comes from a long distance. We expect VAR’s intervention, as it did, to attach the penalty shootout the referee did not see.”
For the canceled goal of Geremegev in Panathinaikos – Atromitos: “In this case, before the end of the end, the Panathinaikos player clearly pushes the opponent during the cross. As we expect, the VAR called the referee to onfield review to cancel the finish for a clear foul on the attack.”
For the canceled goal of Yakoumakis in PAOK – Olympiacos: “Before reaching the goal in PAOK’s No. 65, he claimed the ball, but he made a foul by pressing the opponent’s foot. The VAR recommended onfield review as we expect to cancel the end for a clear foul on the attack.”