The Minister of Immigration and Asylum, Thanos Plevriswas placed on the “Mega Time Society” show on the latest developments in the Tempe case, the demands of the victims’ parents and the government’s attitude towards the judiciary.
At the same time, he also commented on the recent visit of the European Prosecutor, Laura Kovesi, focusing on the part of contracts and security projects.
“It is obvious that not just every parent, let alone in the case of a parent in a case and has rights, obviously he must exercise his rights. A man who has lost his child will exercise all the legal means he judges. Justice sees which one and what they do not. It is obvious that any doubt, question or anything that wants to investigate a place must exercise his right to consider it. Government policy has a clear position here. That on issues that the material has the justice to decide, it cannot take a position or in favor or against. Mr Dendias is not “off the line”, but he says something obvious that every parent has the right to exercise his right. Beyond that, whether this request will be accepted or not, it depends on justice. Mr Routsi makes a request. This request is evaluated on the basis of the information available in the folder. Politically, there is a position of parents who says that no process should start and all the tests related to the corpses should be done first, “he said.
“There is also a place of parents who says that they want to start the same as possible. So in this, you can’t get a place politically. Mr Routsi’s request is obviously reserved, but the evaluation will be made by Justice. Mr. Dendias said the obvious“, He continued.
Regarding Mrs Kovesi’s visit, Plevris underlined: “For the Tempi, Mrs Kovesi talked about something we should not forget. With regard to the “suspicious load” Eur. Prosecutor said there is no evidence. Mrs Kovesi controls criminal responsibilities and not policies. For the Tempe, Mrs Kovesi’s part concerning her competence concerned the part which was under Convention 717. Any projects had been done with security would reduce the risk of an accident. “
For OPEKEPE and what Kovesi said: “Mrs Kovesi on the subject of OPEKEPE was investigating two offenses of the criminal organization that did not send it to the House, and had sent for any infidelity. The House evaluated that there were no reasons. Mrs Kovesi and the Greek Constitution, in which she has apparently expressed that it was an obstacle to further research, could not even investigate politicians. He asked the House to be able to check, we do not know what would be the result. We judged that the elements that came did not constitute a reason for criminal control of politicians. Mrs Kovesi referred to a issue that no one disagrees with, that it is obviously a matter of corruption of central corruption that shows the money of the Eur. subsidies to share correctly. There are issues of political and criminal responsibility. Obviously a scandal beyond its timelessness when it evolves over your days it is clear that it is your political responsibility. We did not say that there is no political responsibility. “