Androulakis: “Citizens choose the political change from stagnation that undermines their daily lives”

“The country wants a credible prime minister, respecting the people’s trouble”

“If the New Democracy is the first party, Mr Mitsotakis will have the initiative to make a government whose work will be one of the same: precision, corruption, impunity. If PASOK is at least a vote in front of the New Democracy, I will have the initiative to make a government that will implement the program I have consistently described in Thessaloniki, “he underlined. Nikos Androulakis Consistent with all political developments on Real FM and Nikos Hatzinikolaou.

“The final judge of the scenarios is the people. If the people bring out the New Democracy first, we will have one of the same. If PASOK comes out, we will have a political change. I believe that people are choosing the political change from stagnation, which undermines their daily lives, “PASOK’s president added, repeating emphatically:”There is no scenario to allow the current policy that is a caress in the oligarchs, caress in interests while the middle class and the weakest Greeks see their lives worse with expensive rents, with expensive foods, with precise energy, with public education – of him. These must change and I believe that the people will finally choose political change. “

Regarding the latest developments in the OPEKEPE scandal and the vote that took place in Parliament, Mr Androulakis said, strongly criticizing the prime minister, that he urged his MPs to go to their homes, not to vote for the letter to the letter and the letter. Justice investigate. “Does this man want a third term as prime minister? No, ending with corruption, ending with impunity. The country wants a credible prime minister, who respects the trouble of the people, who does not prevent justice and who is not constantly loaded with scandals of people in the environment, “he said.

The president of the PASOK Change Movement presented the main axes of the plan over a four-year period that he developed at the TIF stressing that he was “A comprehensive program on how to reform the state, which is a big bet to become a normal European state. With brave initiatives to have transparency, proper functioning, evaluation, and permanence. We have presented our jobs on labor, how Greece will grow financially so that direct foreign investment does not concern the sale of Greek land. Today 1 out of 2 euros coming from abroad is for real estate, which we consider anti -national and anti -development. Immediate foreign investment in the sale of national property and the properties of thousands of Greeks cannot be based. “

In terms of budgetary, Nikos Androulakis noted how The measures presented by PASOK cost 2.6 billion euros. “Let the government say whatever it wants. It is the first time that the Official Opposition to the TIF is being costly, in particular, some four years and some from the beginning of a PASOK governance, “he noted, adding:” The 13th salary is $ 1.27 billion, but the real costs are 750 million, Seven hundred and fifty million is the net we will pay, the difference, 1.27 billion is the mixed. We do not make populism policy as an antidote for public officials to vote for us. What are we saying? The State collapses because young people no longer choose it, they do not want to go to the district to become teachers, teachers, firefighters. We have to somehow support these people, we must support the public sector with an evaluation by ASEP and not by the party’s party appointed and with a 13th salary.

In addition, we talked about new EKAS at 350,000 low -income pensioners. The amount is 540 million. Widow’s pensions, 100 million. For our interventions in the VAT of the products we said – all together – it’s 150 million. “

Especially for PASOK’s proposal to reduce VAT on basic goods, Mr. Androulakis opposed the government’s criticism that it is not. “It comes and changes the contributors to some islands, and as it says … the reduction in products is passing. Isn’t that absurd? “He said

“Let Mr Mitsotakis remember what he was saying about VAT who was committed as an official opposition to reduce. Let him remember his other commitments to the Katrougalos law, to see who the credible and who is unreliable. “

Referring to accuracy, Nikos Androulakis criticized the government that it has chosen the oligopolies to be its allies and also explained: “The government supports its budget on indirect taxes, because we are the only country in Europe for every euro of direct taxes.”

On national issues, the PASOK president spoke of a mockery of the opposition and the Greek people by the government on the issue of Greece-Cyprus electric interconnection.

“He tells us that the investment is continuing, and we know that Turkey’s fault has freely frozen and” killed “with Cyprus. Are these serious things? “ wondered.

Asked about linking Casus Belli’s lifting prime minister with Turkey’s entry into European defense, he was categorical: “Turkey should not participate in the Safe program one way or another. I will tell you the reason: The Turkish National Assembly meets tomorrow morning and we are lifted by Casus Belli. Turkey enters Safe, uses the money of the European taxpayer, the European defense adapts to its own games and after a couple of years we have a casus belli again. Who won? We or Turkey? And to say it anyway? That is, is this only the condition of Mr Mitsotakis, if he gets to the point where I disagree? Isn’t the solution of the Cyprus issue? What will we say to the Cypriot brothers, what will we say? That Attilas exists, but we discuss and allow and do not veto Turkey? “

Finally, he commented on Andrea Loverdos’ accession to New Democracy: “It was a big surprise for me! I was expecting it to go to the KKE ML! Mr Mitsotakis has proven that he is a protagonist in the background, underground routes and deals, and deal as Mr Loverdos said yesterday, “we did a deal”. For me politics is not a deal but it is the service in the public interest. It is an offer. And I want to tell you that these practices characterize the prime minister. Because it is another to agree politically with some people and another is to constantly do background negotiations. “

Source link

Leave a Comment