For a decision taken at the expense of “political expediency” and not under legal arguments, the lawyers of Filistor Destbasidis, Hippocrates Mylonas and Yiannis Apatsidis, refer to their statements, after partly a conviction for their client inNOVARTIS POINT.
Both lawyers heralded that the match will continue with both appealwhich has already been deposited, as well as with the appeal to any European and supranational authority.
Mr. Hippocrates He stressed that during the five -month proceedings “there was no specific evidence of the guilt” of his client, while strongly criticizing the court for “not a single word from the reasoning of the decision”, which described a violation of the European Rights Convention. In fact, he considered the “almost symbolic sentence with suspension” as a “strong indication of the looting of the category”, which, he estimated, “will fall into the Court of Appeal”.
For his part, Mr. Giannis Apatsidis He argued that the conviction was “prescribed by government officials”, which violated the presumption of innocence. He expressed his disappointment as a citizen, saying that the message he is emitted was “no witness dare that he knows how to announce possible corruption acts”. At the same time, he expressed his satisfaction that “what the political system sought, namely the imprisonment in prison […]it was not achieved. “