Ongoing is the second act of political conflict over the case of OPECEPE in the parliament’s plenary hall by discussing the proposals for a pre -trial examination that requests PASOK and SYRIZA-New Left For them M. Voridis and Avgenaki L..
The meeting began at 9am and the government majority intends to support the argument of timeless and inter -liability responsibilities for the pathogens of the Phate Payment Mechanism for references to recent revelations about several “green” party executives. agricultural subsidies declaring pastures even at the top of Agrafa.
See Live:
It is certain that the ND will ask for explanations as to whether in its mechanism “criminal organization“PASOK complains were also involved in his own children. At the same time, the majority will highlight the contradictions of Harilaou Trikoupi, noting, inter alia, that his Members Nikos Androulakis They are calling for the criminal prosecution of Voridis – Avgenakis for the “technical solution”, which they describe as a “legal procedure” when it was applied to the “Green Frames”. “The technical solution provides for the automatic grazing distribution system automatically, which is done legally for thousands of honest breeders,” PASOK said, “covering” a perfectly party official from Rethymnon who was saying pastures in Naoussa and his Agrafa.
At the same time, however, PASOK’s proposal is calling for a prosecution to M. Voridis because as Minister of Rural Development in 2019 he signed the automatic grazing decision by allowing Crete farmers (and) to declare pastures in other areas of Greece! That is, for PASOK, the “automatic grazing distribution” through the technical solution is legal when it comes to its executives, but illegal to everyone else.
Glomex Player(eexbs1jkdkewvzn, v-dboopzar8ic9)
Abstained
In this context, majority MPs will reiterate that the content of the case file does not indicate indications of execution criminal And how at this stage they will not support the demand for a preliminary investigation. They will invite the opposition to withdraw the preliminary investigation proposals by explaining that if they do not get the necessary majority and reject they cannot “revive” in the future if the examination of the examination actually detects criminal data.
According to information, it is quite likely for the ND not to take part in the final secret ballot to – as it will be argued – the opposition will take full responsibility for the final “archiving” of the criminal leg of the case. It should be noted that in the Constitution a proposal to prosecute specific persons for a specific case cannot return to the House if it has previously been rejected.
What will Voridis – Avgenakis say
However, the interest is also focused on the positions of the two former Ministers of Rural Development and Food for which the referral to a preliminary investigation is requested. Mr. Borides He is expected to confine herself to the actions of his own period, stressing that he has not committed nothing and that he is accused of signing a Ministerial Decision that was applied already in 2015. He is expected to submit opinions that confirm – as he will argue – the legitimacy of his actions. He will also note that he is attributed to the offense of moral perpetuation of infidelity for acts that are not described in the case file and who do not have a natural perpetrator!
The former minister is also alleged to have a series of documents at his disposal with what had been done in OPECEPE on his days as well as evidence that reflects the actual motives of some executives who are currently attempting to appear as the Agency’s reflections. It is not certain that he will reveal everything in his speech or to wait for the examination of the exam next September. It is certain, however, that he will call for a confrontation with Mr Gregory Varra in order to clarify the reasons for his resignation and to clarify whether the suspected VAT control initiatives were made before or after his request. In a corresponding track, the placement is expected to move Avgenaki With the former minister noting that the case file does not include his own conversations and that the removal of “suspected” VAT ID took place after checks. At the same time, he is expected to point out that the resignation of the then OPEKEPE President E. Simandrakos was requested on 30.10.2023 due to cumulative problems and serious errors in payments of 2022 and 2023 and not for “blocking VAT”. The former minister seems to have documents at the disposal that prove that Mr Simandrakos’ actions to “freeze” a particular VAT are later than the request to resign. It is also likely to make revelations of involvement in the grazing case and the collection of several thousand euros of political opposition party executives with a strong presence in Crete.
By broader majority the examination
Note that the first episode on OPECEPE’s case ended on Tuesday night with Approval of the proposal submitted by ND to set up a Committee of Inquiry to investigate each dimension of the case over time by 1998.
The examination of examination received a wider majority of 166 MPs as in addition to the ND in favor of the Freedom Cruise and 5 Independent MPs (G. Kontis, K. Floros, H. Katsivardas, P. Sarakis, D. Kyriazidis)
Glomex Player(eexbs1jkdkewvzn, v-dborff5axwfl)
During the marathon discussion preceding the political thermometer rose to the heights with the Kyriakos Mitsotakis To call on opposition parties to vote in favor of the ND’s proposal for examination, as he said, “the pre -trial is not legal.” Addressing in particular to Nikos Androulakis and Socrates Famello, he asked: “What prevents you from voting with us the exam and, if there is any evidence, to consider a pre -trial recommendation? What do you want to hide, refusing to set up exam; “. The prime minister, even responding to PASOK’s president, who in his speech argued that farmers earlier were getting greater subsidies than they were entitled to but resulted in their own pockets rather than “black funds”. He also added that PASOK’s president is reminiscent of the 1980s party, without the gift of Andreas Papandreou.