Particular emphasis is placed on regular processwhere the longer delays are observed. Reformation is mainly achieved through import ‘Pre -trial’. This means that the judge will not have to ascertain issues of indefinite and formal shortcomings for the first time in the case, which often takes place several years after the application was filed.
Acceleration of opposition and electronic platform
Part B ‘of the draft law introduces excellent arrangements for redefinition of oppositions in the forced execution (Articles 632 and 933 Code of Civil Procedure), through platform. The proposed provisions provide for a number of procedural measures to rationalize and accelerate the debate procedure through redefinition of judgments. The purpose is to address the accumulated pending pending tables.
Finally, the settings of Part C ‘introduce significant modifications to the case charge and evaluation of delays of judicial and prosecutors. The changes are intended to balance the workload, with the introduction of maximum and thresholds, depending on the severity and difficulty of each case.
Delay in issuing decisions or processing files will be reason for non -promotionunless the judicial or prosecutor exceeds the ceiling of billing, so the delay is considered justified. These provisions seek to address practical problems, such as under -staffing, which prevent the more effective organization and functioning of justice.