Georgiadis: PASOK Crys that we are not tolerant enough for illegal immigrants – see Socialists in Denmark, passing by Mr. Androulakis

With a post in which he records the measures for the migratory that the socialist government has taken to Denmarkthe Minister of Health replies, Adonis Georgiadisin PASOK For his attitude toward In the government’s arrangements to tackle the increased illegal migratory flows from Libya.

Accusing PASOK of “crying and splitting that we are not tolerant enough for illegal immigrants”, Mr. Georgiadis quotes the seven measures of the Friedrichzen government in Denmark, noting that “according to reports, the government has won politically by the 2015 its electoral influence »

“Passing @androulakisnick when you wake up will be late again,” Adonis Georgiadis concludes.

All Adonis Georgiadis’ post about PASOK and Denmark

In Greece, @pasok is crying and dividing that we are not tolerant enough for illegal immigrants and in Denmark the Socialists there (who rule there because they have such minds) did these:

“Denmark’s immigration policy in recent years has been one of the most rigorous in Europe and is based on a series of measures aimed at limiting the influx of immigrants, especially from non -Western countries. This policy was mainly formed after 2015, when Europe faced the refugee crisis.

Following in detail, the current Danish immigration policy, as in force until 2025:

⸻

1. Restriction of asylum
• Denmark seeks zero reception of asylum seekers.

• The government seeks to process asylum applications in third countries (eg Rwanda), where applicants will be transferred for evaluation and accommodation.
• Approved asylum applications do not automatically give permanent residence or citizenship.

⸻

2. Restrictions on family reunion
• Very strict criteria to reunite someone with their family.
• Necessary conditions: fixed income, linguistic skills and housing.

⸻

3. Criteria for work migration
• Programs for high specialized employees from non -EU countries are reinforced (eg it, medical staff).
• On the contrary, there are obstacles for low -specific workers from third countries.

⸻

4. Incentives for repatriation
• Financial support for a voluntary return of immigrants to their homes.
• In some cases, support is provided for reintegration.

⸻

5. Limit to ‘ghetto’
• The state is implementing a policy against so -called “ghetto”: areas with a high rate of non -Western immigrants.
• Measures are taken to dismantle these communities, such as residential demolitions and population movements.

⸻

6. Citizenship
• Very strict criteria to acquire Danish citizenship: a high level of language, integration, absence of criminal record and financial self -sufficiency.

⸻

7. Policy of integration
• Those approved must participate in compulsory language and political education courses.
• It is also envisaged to participate in an employment program.

⸻

Political context

This policy is adopted by both conservative and social democratic parties, which distinguishes Denmark from many other countries. Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has stated that tight migratory policy is essential for the maintenance of the welfare state.

The prime minister who implemented these strict migratory policies are Mette Frederiksen, the leader of Danish Social Democrats. Taking power in June 2019, he transformed a traditional center -left party into a promoter of a tighter migratory orientation, with the aim – as he argued – the protection of the welfare state and the interests of the workers of the popular strata ().

Some key points:
• The party to the right in terms of immigration began in 2015, when Frederiksen took over the leadership of the party ().
• In 2019, as prime minister, he proceeded with laws on external asylum applications (eg the famous plan with Rwanda), the imposition of a temporary nature on asylum status and other measures such as the seizure of valuable objects and the prohibition of a headscarf – all in order to reduce the influx of non -western migrants.
• According to reports, the government has won politically from the adoption of this harsh policy: it has reduced asylum applications by ~ 90% from 2015 to 2024 and reinforced its electoral influence ().

Passers -by @androulakisnick when you wake up will be late again