Another slap accepted the Donald Trump regarding the policy for their immigrants, As a federal judge suspended the implementation of an US president on Wednesday (02.06.2025) as soon as he returned to power in order to ban people who illegally crossing the border with Mexico to apply for asylum in the US.
The ban was included in a Donald Trump declaration signed on January 20, on the first day of his second term, in which the situation at the country’s southern border It was described as ‘invasion’, because of the mass movement of immigrants to the US territory.
However, a federal judge of the capital ruled that “nothing in the law on immigration and citizenship, or in the Constitution, gives the President or his representatives the excessive powers he relies on in the Declaration and the instructions for his implementation”.
Judge’s ruling follows the appeal of 13 persons, who left to be saved from persecution in Afghanistan, Ecuador, Cuba, Egypt, Brazil, Turkey and Peru, as well as three NGOs, defending the rights of immigrants.
Six of the applicants have already been deported under the Presidential Declaration, the judge said.
In the verdict, he noted that “he recognizes that executive power is facing huge challenges (in its attempt) to prevent irregular entrances to the US and to absorb the overwhelming volume of asylum applications” pending.
However, he insisted that only the law on immigration and citizenship defines the decisions and processes of expulsion.
The judge, however, gave a two -week deadline before the decision was appliedIn order to give the Trump government to appeal, and clarified that it has no retrospective application, it only concerns people who have not yet been deported.
Republican President Trump has proclaimed the fight against irregular migration into absolute priority, continuing to speak of “invasion” into the US “criminals coming from abroad” and taking plenty of deportation by the deportions of the media.
But his plan for mass expulsions of “millions of” people are braking or blocking justice decisions, with arguments, in particular, that people who are targeted have rights that need to be respected.