“It’s a legal mistake, but it has characteristic, monstrous mistakes. It is not as simple as PASOK’s proposal that is wrong institutional for transit interventions, in 291 of the Criminal Code, but it has a seriousness, it is not what the 32 MPs who went to the ultimate betrayal end. Andreas Loverdos For her proposal Maria Karystianou As President of the Association of Relative Victims of Tempi for the recommendation commission.
“It is a monstrous mistake in terms of criminal science, criminal law. It does not stand because there are no evidence of objective status, violence or threat of violence, and secondly, there is no subjective existence, it is obviously not existing, which has to do with the deception of the change in politics by infringing the principle of the distinction of powers. There are no these, ”he told ERT’s radio.
“When I heard it yesterday I didn’t understand how they thought about it. This morning I was given the opportunity to hear Mr Kasselakis, who cited paragraph 3 of the relevant Article 134 of the Criminal Code, which is detailed in what the change of politics means and there is the principle of the distinction of powers when it is violated. There are many issues in many issues during the country’s political and institutional life or overrun powers, you can find. The legislative power often passes by a law, while a court ruling is pending, is therefore estimated to violate its limits and intervenes in the limits of judicial power and the courts do accordingly. From there to be ejected into the ultimate betrayal, that is, a criminal act that presupposes violence or threat of violence, then, then I think the institutional excursion is too long and is not allowed. I believe it is a game of the impressive character of the two words, ultimate betrayal. I think there is no room for the objective existence, that is, see violence or threat of violence, or in terms of subjective substance, deceit, which we can say that we can support a proposal against ministers based on Article 134 of the Criminal Code.
As he said, “Because I heard Mr. Kasselakis and I respect every view, to say that he also look at Article 134, where the legislator analyzes what are the characteristic cases of deterioration of the state and he also mentions the distinction of powers, again that we have the distinction of powers. This leads to the cancellation of the relevant acts by decisions of the judicial function, but there is no jump from there to the ultimate betrayal with such issues. “
“OR high treasonagain, it presupposes a deliberate change in the state, subjective status and violence or threat of violence in terms of objective existence, “continued Loverdos, who said,” here there is a more serious approach to the matter, but wrong in Article 29. However, this fundamental leap is not made to the vacuum with the proposal for the ultimate betrayal by PASOK. In any case, now we have three proposals so far, they will be evaluated by the House. “