To Second part of the meeting with the former President of the Republic and Academic at the headquarters of public law. Prokopios PavlopoulosAngela Tsiftsi, in view and of the discussion to revise the Constitutionhe joins with him on the essence of democracy, focusing, among other things:
*In the way the Constitution is revised and the legal insurance bodies of Article 110, which, as Mr Pavlopoulos states, “is the basis of the rigor of the Constitution”
*In revisions, which have become right and others who served the exercise of the executive and “primarily the Prime Minister” as Mr Pavlopoulos said, stressing that “the way we respect and approach the Constitution,” It is up to the patriotism of the Greeks »
*In the successful revision of 1999-2001 which no one ever questioned and emerged through a broad majority and the 1986 revision, a “revision of feasibility to limit Andreas Papandreou the responsibilities of the President of the Republic, which was then Constantine”
*In responsibilities, such as the possibility of dismantling the House, which were well removed from the PDF because they did not fit into the parliamentary government of Greece and responsibilities such as “a form of ratification of the constitutionality of the laws but also the possibility of convening the Council of Political Leaders” which was needed (as needed by Skopi. Pavlopoulos) was carried out on the basis of an interpretation of the Constitution, as he analyzes.
*In the 2006-2008 revision, which has been referred to as “missed opportunity, because the conditions for radical-and not fragmented-revision of critical provisions of the Constitution” had been politically and socially shaped “
*In Mr Pavlopoulos’s view that the revision of Article 16, in order to allow the establishment of non -profit, non -state universities, must be completed because it will also benefit public universities due to the noble competition that will be created ”
*In the 2015 referendum, for which he was not informed by then Prime Minister Tsipras, but he had to manage it, contacting Francois Hollande, who participated in the European Council, that the country maintains its European course.
*In possible difficulties that may occur in the interpretation of Article 28 § 1
*In the constitutionality of the memorandums
*Returning to the University Chair, inter alia, teaching constitutional law in the first semester of the Athens Law School, as an honorary professor and the importance he gives to man, in the particularities of each/each, behind the status of a student. At the same time, it refers to the changes he has brought to the way his long parliamentary experience teaches, but also to the satisfaction of the crowded room.
*The challenges facing the Constitution and its resistance to the stormy technological changes and the digital age of the Big Data, AI and Configuration.
*In his view that “a great politician is not the one who does not make mistakes but the one who avoids big mistakes”
*In the title he would put in his autobiography: “Christian the end of the life, insanity, unheard of, peaceful …”
See the second part of the interview
Also read: