Harilaou Trikoupis is looking for a climate of low poll efficiency by seeking severe controversy with the government line and distinct distances from SYRIZA and the new left, with the backdrop of the second sentence for the proposal for the proposal Establishment of a pre -trial committee for the tragedy of Tempi.
After several 24 -hour examination of all the data from the Legal Department, Members were called upon to sign a proposal that puts Kostas Achilleas Karamanlis, Christos Spirtzis and their deputy ministers in the same frame. The main category for the Karamanlis period is to disturb the security of (rail) transport, while for the SYRIZA/ANEL term, the long delays in the execution of Convention 717, although the existence of a “depreciation deadline” was known to the table and at the table. K. Karamanlis’ responsibilities (for criminal acts) are also called to investigate those of the Deputy Ministers of Yiannis Kefalogiannis (current Minister of Civil Protection), George Karagiannis, Michalis Papadopoulos and Christos Spirtzis Kasselaki)- The name of former Deputy Minister Panagiotis Sgouridis was also “retired” in the frame.
Harilaou Trikoupi enters the last round of the fierce controversy with the government over the tragedy of Tempi, wanting to appear as the powerful force of the opposition that makes and supports its decisions autonomously-without seeking the acceptance of the initiative (eg). The leadership seems to believe that in addition to the initiative of moves, it is able to oppose convincing arguments in the House, forcing it to be forced by New Democracy to take a position on a series of errors and omissions that eventually did not prevent the tragedy with 57 victims. The reaction and arguments of the New Democracy, however, seem to be tough, while the first comment by Koumoundouros records the answer that it will submit its own proposal (together most likely with the new left) which will have a different rationale for its determination. PASOK stands away from the indictment, as they all show, drawn up by the Freedom Summer and it is not excluded when the discussion in Parliament comes to develop a harsh duel between Mr Androulakis and Zoe Konstantopoulou, who is known to all of the last polls.
PASOK MPs were just informed yesterday- during the telegraph of the parliamentary group- about the content of the proposal that had been curated by the legal department (Messrs. The leadership of SYRIZA and the new Left have clarified that they would study the proposal and rule in the right time by presenting their own moves, while the New Democracy attempted to degrade the legal existence of Harilaou Trikoupi’s text.
PASOK executives participating in the Political Center have not so far discussed the rationale and steps, since the informal party body has not met- as the Political Council or the Central Committee has not been convened to exchange views on all major political developments, inside and outside the walls.
What do they support in the sentence
“The study of the case file deduces that both the officials and the representatives of the workers had repeatedly warned – not only orally but also in writing – the ministry’s political leadership that the state of the railway is tragic, that there is a great shortage of staff and funding, that risks of serious accident. In addition, it was also well-known in the political leadership to delay the implementation of 717 and other projects, such as the restoration of the teleikos in the area in question, the signaling and installation of the GSM-R network. Also, in the years that preceded the tragedy the frequency of accidents, derailments, etc. had increased dangerously and had now become the various events of everyday life, “he said in the text of Harilaou Trikoupis, who argues that:” therefore, there are serious evidence that the minister and the minister The assignment of responsibilities, although they were legally tasked with the duty of supervision and implementation of the safety of rail transport, with their actions and omissions violated substantial security measures and failed to act decisively for the safe operation of the traffic despite being particularly legal. That is to say, what is given to them is that they have been allowed, knowingly, and having been repeatedly warned of the danger, the continuation of the operation of an irreversibly unseen rail connection to the Larissa – New Resources Department and that this danger eventually resulted in the tragedy. “
As is also pointed out in the rationale of the PASOK proposal, “although they were fully aware of their capacity and those above in their relevant documents, the danger of the lack of security valves, as well as the shortages of the safety of the safety, Safety, Communication and Railway Management Systems on the OSE network. Similarly, they did not care so that OSE would carry out in a timely control, supervision, maintenance, recovery and repair of damage in order to achieve a safe rail traffic on the rail network. “
During the critical time (28-2-2023) and a place (in question of Larissa-N. Poros), none of the essential safety systems of rail traffic were operated, nor had the railway safety measures taken (2nd Night Station), no. collision of trains either combined or individually or
(a) Through the operation of the Larissa KEK telephus and two -way photography – signaling of the line
b) of the GSM-R system
(c) Through the presence of a second (2nd) Commander in the evening shift of S. S. Larissa instead of one (1), who (2nd Commander), being present at the station’s station would be in a timely manner of the Commander -in -Chief to react on the crossbar. Larissa and would intervene in order to immediately be immobilized and entered the rise line
(d) Through the reduced speed set for the movement of trains with a relative circular of shorts by the OSE SA Traffic Division (Articles 76 – 77 GCs) in view of the danger of the movement as a result of the aforementioned deficiencies
(e) And by establishing a new national rule, even as a temporary precautionary measure, due to the urgency, which would take into account all the above data and its application would form safe rail traffic conditions, including in the disputed section (Larissa – N.).
In addition, the request states that these politicians performed this criminal act with a possible deceit, as they “fully perceived and knew the disorders in the operation of the rail network and the danger of their criminal behavior, that is, their omission, and they were abolished by their disruption, Their act, especially with their non -timely intervention to solve these problems (although they should have done so), accepted by manifestly all the dangers of the insecure functioning of the network (especially for humans) and displaying negligence as a result of the 57th. They would no longer be the proposed crime of risk but a crime of harm, such as the homicide by intent, and so on, a case that is not our proposal and which is not based on our discretion to date on the case of the case -law).
In the case of Christos Spirtzis and his former deputy ministers, it is noted that the tragic situation of the railway, the long delays in the execution of Convention 717 (the 1st extension was granted on 7/6/2016) and the various warnings, as well as the abolition of the second place. The depreciation deadline states that the House and the Judicial Council is responsible, and in addition to Article 86 (5), it enables the Government member himself at his request to request the control of the category by a special committee that the Parliament may not be set up, which may not be enacted by the Parliament, which may not be enacted by the Parliament. Examination ».