“It seems that Mr. Karamanlis wants to choose the judge and the offense,” commented PASOK spokesman.
“It is attempted by a government spokesman in essence to replace its justice and its decisions,” said Kostas Tsoukalas, speaking to ANT1, in the aftermath of the NTUA’s expertise on the tragedy of Tempi.
Mr Tsoukalas noted that the finding “does not change anything about the responsibilities before 2023, for which we are discussing Mr Karamanlis’ pre -trial pre -trial, nor about the jokes”. “Even this finding does not declare certainty but is likely to be situated, precisely because of the alteration bazaoma, safe conclusions can be drawn,” said PASOK-Mainted Press.
In addition, in terms of fireplace, Mr Tsoukalas commented that “two politicians spoke first about illegal burden: Mr. Velopoulos and the Prime Minister to Mr Schroeder. So Mr Marinakis must apologize for the prime minister. We said that we ask questions based on what the findings say. Mr Karonis says that there can normally be no fireplace from silicone oils, only in very specific cases of specific temperatures. Why is he likely to? Because it was done and it is not possible to clear up data, “he noted.
Addressing a ND member who participated in the television panel, he wondered whether he excludes judicial decisions to acquit persons due to doubts due to the inability to distinguish specific evidence due to the deterioration of the site of the accident. “Because, if this is done,” he said, “it means that the joke will ultimately be the reason we will never know the truth.”
The party’s spokesman announced that the party’s proposal for a pre -trial committee for Kostas Karamanlis was coming up and noted: “We saw the unprecedented, Mr Triantopoulos to choose the judge who would judge him. Here I am afraid that Mr. Karamanlis wants to choose both the judge and the crime. “
Asked about the reasons why PASOK Change Motor made a proposal of mistrust, he said that “the government was saying that a fully guaranteed state would come and PASOK said it would not make a distrust proposal before, but would wait for the official state finding.” “That is, we have the paradox, to be abandoned by the government because we have entrusted the state finding that the government characterized formal and valid,” he said.
Concerning the amendment on the possibility of involvement in related politicians in offshore companies abroad and “the minister’s statements that nothing has changed”, Mr Tsoukalas said that “Mr Floridis deliberately responds to others instead to obscure. It is not enough for the minister to say something. The amendment has to say it too. ” “The Minister cannot verbally or with his statements to interpret the laws and change their meaning. We have not yet reached this point. With the applicable wording, if the wife of the X politician is found with an offshore company, he will not rely on the placement of Floridis on SKAI. The law will be relying on not having legal consequences. To be serious. But even if it changes it, there is an initial intent that has been clearly imprinted. The fact that the government came to pass it that way is a given, “he continued.